Global Warming: objective fact or scientific paradigm?

Discussion of issues involving Global Warming and Climate Control
Bradley House Lounge
2:45
Friday, March 27

IPCC: Graphics Presentations & Speeches
 

 

    Some figures from the most recent report of the IPCC    

Climate change
Source: muller.lbl.gov

    Climate Change Chapter from Physics for Future Presidents

Salon.com Books | Our rosy future, according to Freeman Dyson
Source: www.salon.com

Sep. 29, 2007 | In his new collection of essays, “A […]

More on page 20

Darwin’s Legacy: Science and Religion

Philosophy Club Discussion on the relationship between Science and Religion in celebration of Darwin’s 200th Birthday on Feb. 12!

Date:
Friday, February 13, 2009

Time:
2:45pm - 4:15pm

Location:
3rd Floor Bradley House

Darwin Day page

“Secular Philosophy and the Religious Temperament”
An article by Thomas Nagel

More on page 18

Inclusiveness at Saint Anselm College

Inclusiveness at Saint Anselm College
an Open Discussion
Friday 1/23 2:30PM
Bradley House Lounge
Here is some background information courtesy of Prof. Latona

Item #1: Inclusiveness Initiative Information

This a link to the website for Inclusiveness at Saint Anselm College
Item #2: Recent Items in the Manchester Union Leader

This is the Union Leader’s story on the inclusiveness initiative at Saint Anselm College.

This […]

More on page 17

Discussion of Quantum Mechanics with Professor Durham

News, Discussions Comments (0)

Date:

 

Thursday, April 16, 2009

Time:

 

3:45pm - 5:00pm

Location:

 

Bradley House Lounge

Schrodinger's Cat

An Informal Discussion with Professor Ian Durham of the Physics Department on the state of recent research in Quantum Mechanics.

An Introduction to some of the issues can be found here:
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=was-einstein-wrong-about-relativity&print=true

David Banach @ April 14, 2009

Discussion with Gordon College: Is God’s Truth always Mediated?

News, Discussions Comments (0)

Trip to Gordon College, April 4

Whether, and to what extent, the Truth of God (including, but not limited
to, revealed truth) permits–or even in some instances requires– mediation
through human language, images, concepts, acts of interpretation,
philosophical reflection, etc.  In other words, in this life do we ever have
immediate access to Divine Truth, or does it always come to us via human,
all-too-human mediating agency.

We will leave from Bradley House at 9:15 AM on Saturday April 4

From the organizers at Gordon:
“As background reading to set up the question, you might want to have
students in your philosophy-theology club take a look at James K.A. Smith’s
book, *The Fall of Interpretation*, in which he argues for the possibility,
inevitability and desirability of interpretive mediation of divine truth
from prelapsarian Eden even to the resurrected life.”

JKA Smith-Fall of Interpretation-Introduction

Here are similar works available online:
The Principle of Incarnation
http://www.calvin.edu/academic/philosophy/virtual_library/articles/smith_james/principle%20of%20incarnation.pdf
Between Predication and Silence: Augustine On How (Not) to Speak of God
http://www.calvin.edu/academic/philosophy/virtual_library/articles/smith_james/Betw072701.pdf
Lost in Translation
http://www.christianitytoday.com/bc/2007/novdec/16.36.html


Facebook:

http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/event.php?eid=60296959910&ref=nf

David Banach @ March 31, 2009